Friday, November 18, 2016

Millennial Internation

Won't you give your $2990 per month to keep Declan on his gluten free diet?

Monday, October 24, 2016

Maryland Stadium - Venue Review

Frankly, I thought all that Under Armour money would be put to better use.

About a half hour outside of Washington, D.C. (give or take an hour or two for traffic), the University of Maryland in College Park is a new member to the Big Ten Conference. For the first conference game against my beloved Golden Gophers, I met up with a group of friends to check out Capital One Field at Maryland Stadium and their campus as the Gophers worked their way toward a 31-10 victory.

Pre-Game Tailgate

There are a number of open and available tailgate lots all over campus. We bought our tailgating passes from the University of Maryland and paid about $20 for the parking spot. There's no need to arrive early. In fact, we got to the tailgate lot about 8 a.m. and were among the first to arrive for a noon kick-off.

What struck us most about the tailgate situation at Maryland was the laid out list of rules that included a weak attempt to draw a line between "partying" and "tailgating". It seems music is a big problem at Maryland. If you have music, that means you're crossing the line between a party and tailgate which could get you in trouble. Although, I must admit, I didn't see anyone actually asked to turn their music down.

Overall, the fans were cordial but this didn't feel like a major football environment out in the tailgate lots. After trips to some of the less-impressive Big Ten football programs like Indiana - I'd put Maryland in the bottom tier, right next to Northwestern and far behind the rest of the conference.

From our tailgating spot, it was only about a 10 minute walk to the stadium.
Restrooms were another struggle. We set-up our tailgate next to the "Engineering Fields" that are very close to the University's Visitors Center. Until 9 a.m., there were no restrooms available and even the portable toilets in view were locked up --- which seemed to sort of defeat the purpose of portable toilets.

Traffic wasn't a problem on our way in. As I mentioned, the game day atmosphere wasn't really in full effect until much closer to kick-off.

Getting Into Maryland Stadium

Maryland Stadium holds just over 51,000 fans at capacity and with a 3-2 Minnesota team coming to town, we didn't expect it to be a sell-out. While a college town, College Park doesn't appear to be a college football town. (We're told to come back during basketball season).

The walk from the tailgate lots was pleasant on a warm autumn day. The campus was well-maintained and there were no safety issues in terms of sketchy folks around the stadium.

One thing that stood out was that as we walked toward the stadium, we saw a ton of students walking the opposite direction. It was bizarre. In fact, we had to re-check Google Maps because we thought maybe we'd taken a wrong turn along the way. It turns out, students at Maryland just don't really care about football.

We did encounter a bit of a bottleneck at the southwest entrance to Maryland stadium when trying to enter.

We didn't anticipate a 15-minute or so wait at the gate to get through security and to our seats. Not a huge deal but we probably should have planned for it. Because of the delay, we missed the opening kick-off and anthem.

Inside - The Game

Our seats were located in the southwest corner of the stadium behind the Minnesota bench on about the 10 yard line (Section 3). We were situated about 25 rows up from the field and had great sight-lines with no real issues in that regard.

When looking for tickets (we paid $25/each on Stubhub), we had some worries that seats closer to the field might have some serious obstructions because of a lack of elevation. Seats were cheap, even in the second and third rows from the field and we figured we should avoid them.

It turns out, we might have been misguided - here's a look from about the tenth row:

The whole environment inside was ok at the start of the game but the fanbase almost felt distracted. The student section was ok but not exactly rowdy and the rest of the fans kind of seemed irritated that they were expected to put up with a football game that afternoon. 

Our seats were located close to the end zone opposite the student section and University of Maryland Marching Band. The band was pretty loud - loud enough that we could clearly hear them. At some stadiums, that's actually a big issue --- the band plays but is basically inaudible from the far reaches of the stadium.

Fans were very nice to us as visitors - don't get me wrong. It just seemed like they weren't really "die-hard" fans of the Terrapins. Which, might be understandable given the program's mediocre history of performance.

Of course, you might want to bring a book:

Probably the worst college football fan east of the Mississippi

Concessions were reasonably priced but I'm told I missed the boat on the really interesting local fare. Behind the visitors section, concessions largely offered the types of things you'd expect with no real deviation - hotdogs, chips, soda, beer. (Yes, they serve beer inside Maryland Stadium). 

I'm told that on the other side of the stadium - likely where the bigger money boosters sit - they do have some more interesting concession offerings. Stuff like crab cakes and the sort of items you'd expect that close to the coast.

Wrap-Up of the Trip

Overall, the trip was a C and would've been much worse if Minnesota had lost. The atmosphere inside Maryland Stadium wasn't worth the effort of getting there. That said, as a Minnesota fan living in Tennessee, I'll probably return the next time they play here as D.C. is an easy flight and tickets to the game itself were pretty reasonable.

If you go - be sure to check out the home-sideline concession options (unlike me) and if you insist on getting to the tailgate lots before 9 a.m., be sure to go to the bathroom before you arrive!

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Your Powder Matters

I thought this was a pretty interesting guide. I'm not the chemist that a lot of my reloading friends are but pretty cool nonetheless.

That's Vihtavuori Powder on the left-hand side versus the slower burning Hodgdon Powder on the right. It's interesting to see the real-time burn rates. Obviously, inside an ammo cartridge you don't get to see the combustion that you can see in this example. I'm curious if the pressure inside a cartridge plays a role in how it burns though. I would assume with limited oxygen that would play a role in how the fire eats fuel.

Widener's has some more neat images in their smokeless powder guide. If you're curious about reloading (and with the election ammo rush in full swing, who isn't?) it's worth 10 minutes to check out.

Monday, September 5, 2016

Venue Review - The Bowl at Sugar HIll

The Bowl at Sugar Hill - Third Eye Blind peforming
The Bowl at Sugar Hill on Sept. 3, 2016.
I'd never heard of Sugar Hill, Georgia until recently. About 40 minutes northeast of Atlanta, my wife and I spotted the mostly popular in the 1990's band, Third Eye Blind was playing over Labor Day weekend and we made the trip south to check it out.

Map showing the bowl at sugar hill relative to atlanta

The Bowl at Sugar Hill is located immediately behind Sugar Hill's City Hall building and all indications are it is run by the City of Sugar Hill, which may be where this concert went wrong, but I'll get to that in a moment.

The Bowl at Sugar Hill

As we pulled into Sugar Hill, we mistakenly stopped at an ATM expecting to need cash to park. However, that wasn't an issued. Without too much trouble, we quickly spotted a spot in a city parking lot that offered room for free. We were off to a good start.

As we walked past what appeared to be a brand new, golden guttered city hall building my wife was delighted seeing all the people lounging with coolers, blankets, etc. It was a nice little vibe. Obviously not a resident myself, you could get the sense that these events could play a role in building a community feeling. Also, the fact that you could carry-in your own alcohol may also explain why everyone seemed to know everyone else so well!

Outside the "Bowl" there were about a half dozen vendors set-up with a couple food trucks with the standard sort of fare. We didn't eat at the show but can attest that The Diner at Sugar Hill is worthy of the top spot it occupies on Trip Advisor for restaurants in the area.

Grandstand at the Bowl at Sugar Hill
The grandstand at the Bowl in Sugar Hill

We had reserved tickets that were about 5 rows from the stage. There are various levels of grassy terrace in the primary grandstand. For the show, they line what my wife jokingly referred to as "wedding chairs" for seating. Not necessarily uncomfortable and the set-up seemed just fine for something like this.

Who Sucked Out The Feelin'?

After an opening band that my wife and I agreed must have just been crowned king of the Sugar Hill High School's talent show the previous week (I didn't catch their name but thought they said something like "Cock Guard" --- which is probably not correct) there was about a half-hour pause while the stage was remade for the main event.

Then, Third Eye Blind took the stage and the night got weird.
Third Eye Blind frontman Steven Jenkins at The Bowl at Sugar Hill
Third Eye Blind's Steven Jenkins.
As lead singer Steven Jenkins started singing, it was as if his microphone hadn't been turned on. No lyrics, no  real sounds coming from it. Eventually, it started to play over the house speakers at faint levels but it was clear either we were all being pranked by Jenkins or something was messed up.

The band never explained exactly what was wrong. They simply played their first song (minus any audible lyrics) and then quietly left the stage.

Moments later, the band would re-emerge as Jenkins explained there were some technical issues that caused the problem and could continue to wreak havoc on their set. Paraphrasing Jenkins, it could happen at any moment and could impact just about everything they used to make music. (I'm no audio expert but I wonder if it wasn't a board issue of some kind).

Near the end of Third Eye Blind's set.

Throughout the night, the band clearly ran into technical issues at a few different points but to their credit they took it all in stride. At one point, Jenkins came on stage with just a guitar and performed a few songs. They're not a negative lot so Jenkins put on a mostly happy face and even seemed to poke fun at some of the culture of pop music today.

"There are no synthesizers, we're not a DJ band," Jenkins joked at one point.

All-in-all, I'd estimate the band played for just shy of an hour and a half. I'm not sure if Sugar Hill has any sort of noise ordinances in place that would have prevented them from going longer. 

Wrap-Up & Video

Of course, it was frustrating to have set-aside a holiday weekend to take in a show that was hit by technical issues that clearly sucked the energy out of the concert. We'd seen Third Eye Blind less than a year before at the Tennessee Theatre. Plainly, the bar was set high and my wife was delighted by the show in our hometown. 

In this latest case, the show was alright but the false-start clearly detracted from the overall experience. You can get a taste of what we experienced with the video below that highlights about a minute of what appeared to be technical glitch-free goodness.


Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Re: Trump's Fundraising Request

Mr. Trump,

Thank you for reaching out to me with the opportunity to help fuel your campaign.

It probably comes as no surprise to you, I'm not in the position of giving things away. In fact, as I age I'm doing all I can to get better at making really good deals. Because of that penchant for making good deals, I'm learning to discern between winning investments and losers --- but also getting adequate compensation for the amount of risk I'm taking.

While it seems clear you find your offer to match my contribution 1:1 is generous, I disagree. You see, you own the campaign and I have no real upside financially if I help fund your campaign on its way to victory. 

While some might be tempted to point to your enormous personal wealth as a reason a middle-class American should not feel any obligation to donate to your campaign. I don't think this is the proper tact. Rather, I insist that we look at campaigns the same way we would look at any investment - through the lens of return on investment and best alternative to a negotiated settlement.

In fact, a good case can be made that you're a long-shot at best right now. It seems that the 1:1 ratio you suggest is not even close to being a winning deal for my camp.

That said, I won't be funding your opponent either. In fact, I consider the time I've invested in learning about both you and Mrs. Clinton a sunk cost that I will never recoup. While I wish you the best in your efforts, your offer at this point is just not intriguing enough to have me reaching for my wallet.

Thank you for the opportunity and I certainly look forward to any counter proposals you see fit to make.

On Jun 21, 2016, at 11:00 AM, "Donald J. Trump" <> wrote:


This is the first fundraising email I have ever sent on behalf of my campaign. That's right. The FIRST ONE

And, I'm going to help make it the most successful introductory fundraising email in modern political history by personally matching every dollar that comes in WITHIN THE NEXT 48 HOURS, up to $2 million! 

XXX, this means any donation you make between $1 and $2,700 (the maximum allowable contribution) will be matched, dollar-for-dollar. 

Help make history by giving one of the amounts below:

Even without this match, this initial effort would have been the most successful first fundraising email in history. I am certain of this. But let me tell you why I decided to match your donations. 

The Democrats are desperate, and they're throwing everything they have at me. They just keep failing and losing. 

Now they've sent out a very nasty email attacking me, all to raise a measly $250,000. They even promise that a group of "all-star Democrats" will match every dollar raised. 

They will say and do anything to elect Hillary Clinton, but I am standing in the way. 

We can't let her back into the White House ever again. 

The bottom line – Crooked Hillary has been a DISASTER for our country, and we must win against her XXX. 

Let's make history again, and keep winning, by making this the most successful first fundraising email ever

Let's show the liberals, the professional pundits, and the Washington establishment that this campaign IS NOT ABOUT ME. It's a movement of hardworking, patriotic people who want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

Best Wishes, 

Donald J. Trump
Candidate for President of the United States 

P.S. Help me make my first ever fundraising email the most successful fundraising email ever sent in the history of modern politics. Remember, I will PERSONALLY match your donation, but we must receive it WITHIN THE NEXT 48 HOURS

Monday, June 20, 2016

Stupid Quotes From Monday's Senate Gun Debate

If you missed it (and unless your remote control was broken with the TV stuck on C-SPAN2, why would you catch it?) the Senate debated a number of gun related issues Monday. (HR-2578 is the official bill if you're into that sort of thing).

I thought it'd be fun to take notes because I'm a glutton for punishment. Without further ado, here's how things played out.

Harry Reid - (D - Nevada), Senate Minority Leader

3:12 p.m. First highlight of the day was when Harry Reid called Newtown, Connecticut, "Newton". Nevermind that the Newtown tragedy is central to the Dems' talking points today, how does any American not recognize the city involved with the Sandy Hook shootings?

3:14 p.m. Reid just did it again, "Newton". How do you sit on a soapbox of respect for those "victims" when you can't even learn the city they lived in?

3:15 p.m. Reid continues to call it "Newton". Isaac Newton is proud and I could use a beer.

3:16 p.m. Reid on a 30-round AR-15 magazine, that he of course called a "clip":  "It would take 3-4 seconds to empty it"  Based on his language, he seems to have a semi and fully automatic rifle confused. (common theme among liberal politicians).

Patrick Leahy (D - Vermont)

3:20 p.m. It sounds like Sen. Leahy just wanted to get out of writing a letter. He read his response to a 15-year old who is concerned about guns. At least saved taxpayers a stamp by reading his response on the Senate floor rather than mailing it.

Barbara Mikulski (D- Maryland)

3:33 p.m. "I'll tell you why I support a filibuster, guns, guns, guns, guns!"

3:40 p.m. "40% of gun sales are unlicensed, they are sold online or at gun shows. That means 40% of the gun sales have no background check."   - How is this stat possible? Without a background check, how does the government know about it to count them?

It turns out this stat is based on 1994 data that Hillary Clinton has used extensively. The stats are derived from phone interviews conducted with just 251 people. In that survey, about 24% indicated they received their firearm as a gift or via inheritance --- which would be lumped in with the 40% number Dems love to tout. I'd say there's a pretty big difference between getting Grandpa's World War II M1 and lurking in the shadows trying to buy a firearm "off the grid" to do something nasty with it.

Richard Blumenthal (D - Connecticut)

4:14 p.m. "AR-15's are weapons of war and mass destruction."   I guess we found what we were looking for in Iraq post-9/11 then, huh?

Bill Nelson (D - Florida)

5:25 p.m. (Paraphrasing) "There are only 5,000 people on the terror watch list. Who cares if we restrict their rights with no due process."

5:35 p.m. - Close of Debate

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Reliving the NRA AM

I was hoping to get to this sooner but, alas, life.

On a scale of 1-10, I'd give this past week's NRA Annual Meeting a 7.

Great attendance, solid political speeches and a great turnout on the show floor by the industry as a whole. That said, the show itself had a few logistics-related issues that got in the way of a better score and something beyond anyone's control, the weather created even more problems.


I was a bit surprised the National Rifle Association was willing to extend a direct endorsement to Trump so soon. I don't think anyone who is familiar with the organization and gunnies in general would be surprised at the number of self-identifying "libertarians" among the ranks. Because of this, I thought the NRA might allow a bit more time for Trump's candidacy to breathe and allow the same time for Gary Johnson to make his case and see if he'd get any traction.

Furthering my concerns, Trump said a few things to the NRA that I wouldn't think he'd want public in that setting. Especially his remarks about the number of rifles his sons having as "being scary" [not his exact words but close enough].


I had a good chat with Chris Hodgdon from Hodgdon Powder in Louisville He seems like a genuine guy and doesn't know me from Adam so I was impressed with his willingness to chat with an "average joe".

I did pick up a couple pounds of the Titegroup Hodgdon Powder from Widener's and will be hopefully trying some reloading in the next few days. This isn't my first go - but my first reloading effort in a long time. (Yeah, I'm the idiot that waits until ammo is nearly free to start playing with a reloading press again).


I'm pretty bummed I didn't get more of a chance to check out more of Louisville's local food scene. I'm not a foodie but felt like there was probably more to offer than the CVS Pharmacy meal I bought for myself Saturday night! Sorry, not much insight here!

Next Year

I should have a chance to get down to next year's NRA AM in Atlanta and I think that'll be another good one in terms of attendance. Georgia is about as gun friendly as it gets (minus the Governor) and I think a couple months after Hillary or Trump's election, the political climate will be a hot one. 

If your'e headed to the show - hit me up.  Have a good one.